In both the articles written by Natalie Zervou, the term legal limbo really catches my attention. The word ‘limbo’ is a Roman Catholic term which refers to [tome_reference id=”1555″ biblio-id=”1553″]“a place for infants who die after birth and before baptism”[/tome_reference]. Another word used to describe this state is ‘gray area’ because it is not certain if the infant can be regarded as a Christian or not. From an anthropological point of view as described in Zervou’s article Bodies of Silence and Resilience: Writing Marginality, legal limbo is a gray area between [tome_reference id=”1556″ biblio-id=”1511″]“undocumented illegality and refugee status”[/tome_reference] (175).
In this article, Zervou defines the term legal limbo and blames the [tome_reference id=”1557″ biblio-id=”1511″]“influx of illegal immigrants”[/tome_reference] to have increased the issue (175). She then touches upon the increasing interest of choreographers in this state and their attempts to help refugees or economic immigrants to reflect these issues and create awareness about it among an audience. [tome_reference id=”1558″ biblio-id=”1511″]She gives an example of a documentary Bodies of Resilience that focuses on the state of legal limbo and tries to explain how it affects an immigrant or a refugee[/tome_reference] (176,177). A script of this documentary that she includes in her article puts forward the idea of how these immigrants find themselves in equally challenging position as they did in their own countries. [tome_reference id=”1559″ biblio-id=”1511″]From the fear of authorities like police to the fear of nationalist extremists, these people who live in different countries without a legal documentation do not get to live a normal life[/tome_reference] (177). [tome_reference id=”1561″ biblio-id=”1495″]In her other article Fragments of the European Refugee Crisis, she includes an excerpt from Heath Cabot’s work On the Doorstep of Europe: Asylum and Citizenship in Greece to explain the state of legal limbo that “asylum seekers” get into when their request is neither accepted nor rejected[/tome_reference] (41). These refugees cannot completely get out of the trauma of leaving their own countries and start being optimistic about their new abode as they are still not sure if this new place is their home.
The reason why this term greatly interests me is because it makes me wonder how do the refugees survive with all this going on. If they are unable to take jobs, how are they going to take a new start? If this problem has not existed for them, it is very likely that these refugees develop a position of offering their skills to the host countries and thus taking off the financial burden from these countries. However, this is not as simple as it sounds. It is particularly because of the natural defensive position of the nationals who fear this very idea of losing their nationality in the hands of the “others” who are somewhere between being legal and illegal. I am really interested in this idea of creating awareness about this situation of migrants and refugees among the audience, particularly nationals, to make them look at the humanitarian side of the situation rather than political one. I wonder if Aakash’s piece #JeSuis portrays this state of legal limbo. Did Aakash get a chance to talk to the refugees how are they being affected by being in a legal limbo and how would they like the world to understand what they are going through?